Sather Byerly and Holloway, LLP
This text is replaced by the Flash movie.
   
   
 
Sign-up To Receive The SBH Newsletter

August 2006 SBH Quarterly Newsletter

PDF Format

By Norm Cole

Older case law from the Board and the Court of Appeals held that workers are not entitled to reinstatement of TTD when they leave work for reasons unrelated to the injury. However, in a recent decision, Fidel Vivanco, 58 Van Natta 1677 (2006), the Board concluded TTD had to be reinstated unless the attending physician had approved a job description of the modified job the worker voluntarily performed.

Following a work injury, Vivanco voluntarily returned to modified work. His attending physician was not notified of the specific duties the modified work entailed and thus had not agreed claimant was capable of performing them. Several months later, while still working the modified job, Vivanco was terminated. SAIF stopped paying TTD. The Board relied on ORS 656.325(1) to find the cessation of TTD was wrong and approval of a modified job by the attending physician was a prerequisite to ending TTD payments.

The Vivanco decision is a significant change in the law. SAIF has filed an appeal to the Court of Appeals and we will monitor the outcome. Employers, insurers, and administrators can continue payment of TPD and thereby avoid reinstatement of TTD only if the worker's physician has reviewed and approved a description of the modified job. Although Vivanco did not clarify if an employer/carrier must make a bona fide job offer to an employee who is voluntarily performing modified work, making such an offer protects your ability to continue payment of TPD if the worker leaves the job for reasons unrelated to the injury.

<< Newsletter Page



Sather, Byerly & Holloway, LLP
U.S. Bancorp Tower | 111 S.W. Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200 | Portland, Oregon 97204
[P] 503.225.5858 | [F] 503.721.9272